Correction ::
There's is something wrong with what i have mentioned in the previous post. We do not need to generate a Java code and run it separately again. We can Just create objects using JUNG and we can execute them though JPF too.
Update ::
I went though JUNG and found out some interesting facts. So by using JUNG we can do two type of things as our final outcome.
1.) We can out put the graphs into a JFrame which is possible to zoom and pan ::
If we are going to output it to a JFrame, as i figured it out its possible to animate it as well. We can just add the nodes (states) in the way they appear in the actual program (but slowly to make it easy to understand).
2.) We can output the final graph in to a .jpg or kind of a file format as the final result too.
And what i figured about JUNG is we can compile the JUNG codes to our source as set of external libraries. Still i have not found any text against that. Other than JUNG's code it users
*) Larvalabs' generics version of Apache's Commons Collections libraries: http://larvalabs.com/
*) The CERN Colt libraries (for some algorithms and I/O operations): http://www-itg.lbl.gov/~
Those libraries are already bundled inside the complete JUNG library set.
Please comment if you have any concerns and ideas. Thank you.
0 Response to "Findings on JUNG"
Post a Comment